This week, President Biden and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu shared differing views on the killing of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar. While Biden saw it as an opportunity for peace, Netanyahu considered it a settled score but acknowledged that the task ahead was not yet complete.
Sinwar was responsible for a deadly attack on Israel in 2023, and his death was seen as a significant development. However, the discussion of settled scores and peace seemed premature, reminiscent of the “Mission Accomplished” banner displayed during the Iraq war, which lasted for years and claimed many lives.
History has shown that war often leads to more conflict rather than peace. Treaties may be signed, but the underlying issues remain unresolved. Conflicts with nonstate actors, like ISIS, can be especially challenging to end, as they often target civilians and essential resources like water.
The situation in Gaza and Lebanon highlights the vulnerability of displaced children and the importance of providing humanitarian aid. The U.S. has a role to play in ensuring that civilians have access to necessities like safe drinking water and healthcare, rather than contributing to the cycle of violence.
The death of a leader like Sinwar may not deter others but could instead inspire further resistance. The idea of ending a conflict by force is often misguided, as it can strengthen the resolve of those fighting against oppression.
Biden’s call for more humanitarian aid to Gaza is a step in the right direction, emphasizing the need to prioritize the well-being of innocent civilians. The U.S. must hold Israel accountable for its actions and ensure that American support is contingent on respecting human rights and international humanitarian law.
Ultimately, the key to ending the conflict in the Middle East lies in addressing the root causes of violence and instability, rather than resorting to military force. By prioritizing the needs of the most vulnerable populations, we can work towards a more peaceful and sustainable future for all.
